P.P. ARNAHAWA PS 115
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP274 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 274 | 50.93% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 88 | 16.36% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 66 | 12.27% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 35 | 6.51% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 20 | 3.72% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 10 | 1.86% | |
| 7 | MOTEEN | IND | 9 | 1.67% | |
| 8 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 8 | 1.49% | |
| 9 | SURESH | JAP | 7 | 1.30% | |
| 10 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 5 | 0.93% | |
| 11 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 12 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 14 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 15 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 16 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 538 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 274 | 50.93% | 1 | 84 | Strong |
| IND | 120 | 22.30% | 2 | 204 | Weak |
| SP | 66 | 12.27% | 3 | 282 | Weak |
| BSP | 35 | 6.51% | 4 | 56 | Poor |
| INC | 20 | 3.72% | 5 | 34 | Poor |
| NOTA | 10 | 1.86% | 6 | 43 | Poor |
| JAP | 7 | 1.30% | 7 | 4 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.74% | 8 | 42 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.37% | 9 | 151 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.