P.P. RATAN PUR PURVI BHAG PS 112
ZEBA RIZWAN
INDIND257 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 257 | 38.42% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 205 | 30.64% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 111 | 16.59% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 50 | 7.47% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 12 | 1.79% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 7 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 10 | SURESH | JAP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 11 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 12 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 13 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 14 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 15 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 16 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 669 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 274 | 40.96% | 1 | 17 | Strong |
| BJP | 205 | 30.64% | 2 | 193 | Average |
| SP | 111 | 16.59% | 3 | 137 | Weak |
| BSP | 50 | 7.47% | 4 | 21 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 1.79% | 5 | 98 | Poor |
| NOTA | 8 | 1.20% | 6 | 76 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.60% | 7 | 40 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.45% | 8 | 40 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 149 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.