P.P. MADARGARH ROOM NO 1 PS 105
ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN
SPSP149 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 149 | 33.56% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 121 | 27.25% | |
| 3 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 114 | 25.68% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 29 | 6.53% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 11 | 2.48% | |
| 6 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 6 | 1.35% | |
| 7 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 8 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 9 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 11 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 12 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 14 | MOTEEN | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 15 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 444 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 149 | 33.56% | 1 | 72 | Average |
| IND | 132 | 29.73% | 2 | 185 | Average |
| BJP | 114 | 25.68% | 3 | 357 | Average |
| BSP | 29 | 6.53% | 4 | 82 | Poor |
| NOTA | 11 | 2.48% | 5 | 31 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.35% | 6 | 246 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.45% | 7 | 147 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 172 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 338 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.