P.P. KERWANIYA ROOM NO. 2 PS 104
ZEBA RIZWAN
INDIND228 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 228 | 43.26% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 186 | 35.29% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 61 | 11.57% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 18 | 3.42% | |
| 5 | MOTEEN | IND | 5 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 7 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 8 | ATMARAM | BSS | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 9 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 10 | SURESH | JAP | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 11 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 12 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 13 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 14 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 15 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 16 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 527 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 244 | 46.30% | 1 | 27 | Strong |
| BJP | 186 | 35.29% | 2 | 229 | Average |
| SP | 61 | 11.57% | 3 | 306 | Weak |
| BSP | 18 | 3.42% | 4 | 162 | Poor |
| BSS | 4 | 0.76% | 6 | 40 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.76% | 7 | 305 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.76% | 5 | 39 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.57% | 8 | 38 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.57% | 9 | 278 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.