SARVODAY INTER COLLAGE-MIHIPURWA (PARWANIGAUDHI) R.N.-5 PS 259
SAROJ SONKAR
COL 2121225 votes at this polling station
over AKSHAYBAR NATH KANAUJIYA (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ SONKAR | COL 21 | 225 | 67.77% | |
| 2 | AKSHAYBAR NATH KANAUJIYA | COL 12 | 90 | 27.11% | |
| 3 | RAMCHANDRA | COL 18 | 9 | 2.71% | |
| 4 | JITENDRA KUMAR | COL 27 | 4 | 1.20% | |
| 5 | KIRAN BHARTI | COL 15 | 2 | 0.60% | |
| 6 | KANTI | COL 24 | 2 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | DEEPAK | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | RINKU SAHANI | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | RAJ SRI | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | VIJAY | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SHIV CHARAN | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 332 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 225 | 67.77% | 1 | 211 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 90 | 27.11% | 2 | 330 | Average |
| COL 18 | 9 | 2.71% | 3 | 266 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 4 | 1.20% | 4 | 114 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 2 | 0.60% | 5 | 320 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 2 | 0.60% | 6 | 351 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 356 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 365 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 364 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 354 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 376 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 282, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.