SARVODAY INTER COLLAGE-MIHIPURWA (PARWANIGAUDHI) R.N.-3 PS 257
SAROJ SONKAR
COL 2121397 votes at this polling station
over AKSHAYBAR NATH KANAUJIYA (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ SONKAR | COL 21 | 397 | 66.39% | |
| 2 | AKSHAYBAR NATH KANAUJIYA | COL 12 | 181 | 30.27% | |
| 3 | KIRAN BHARTI | COL 15 | 7 | 1.17% | |
| 4 | RAMCHANDRA | COL 18 | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 5 | KANTI | COL 24 | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 6 | JITENDRA KUMAR | COL 27 | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | RAJ SRI | COL 36 | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | SHIV CHARAN | COL 42 | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | RINKU SAHANI | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | VIJAY | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DEEPAK | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 598 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 397 | 65.73% | 1 | 43 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 181 | 29.97% | 2 | 192 | Average |
| COL 15 | 7 | 1.16% | 3 | 95 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 5 | 0.83% | 4 | 331 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 3 | 0.50% | 5 | 317 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 3 | 0.50% | 6 | 144 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 234 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 269 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 352 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 354 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 363 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 282, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.