PRIMARY SCHOOL BURHANPUR ROOM NO 1 PS 142
4-Ram Achal Rajbhar
SPSamajwadi Party235 votes at this polling station
over 2-Dharmraj Nishad (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4-Ram Achal Rajbhar | SP | 235 | 50.21% | |
| 2 | 2-Dharmraj Nishad | BJP | 151 | 32.26% | |
| 3 | 1-Chandra Prakash Verma | BSP | 49 | 10.47% | |
| 4 | 10-Suresh Kumar | MAP | 8 | 1.71% | |
| 5 | 5-Chandresh | ASPKR | 5 | 1.07% | |
| 6 | 6-Jitendra Kumar | BMP | 5 | 1.07% | |
| 7 | 11-Brijesh Kumar | IND | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 8 | 12-Bhanu Pratap | IND | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 9 | 3-Priyanka | INC | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 10 | 9-Mool Chand Jaiswal | AAP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 11 | 8-Manoj Kumar | RJSP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | 7-Durvijay Pal | VPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 468 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 235 | 49.47% | 1 | 145 | Strong |
| BJP | 151 | 31.79% | 2 | 220 | Average |
| BSP | 49 | 10.32% | 3 | 311 | Weak |
| IND | 8 | 1.68% | 4 | 35 | Poor |
| MAP | 8 | 1.68% | 5 | 7 | Poor |
| BMP | 5 | 1.05% | 7 | 50 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 5 | 1.05% | 6 | 43 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.84% | 8 | 259 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.42% | 9 | 74 | Poor |
| RJSP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 107 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 269 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 281, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.