COMPOSITE UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL TAJANPUR ROOM NO 2 PS 138
2-Dharmraj Nishad
BJPBharatiya Janata Party151 votes at this polling station
over 1-Chandra Prakash Verma (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2-Dharmraj Nishad | BJP | 151 | 43.39% | |
| 2 | 1-Chandra Prakash Verma | BSP | 108 | 31.03% | |
| 3 | 4-Ram Achal Rajbhar | SP | 64 | 18.39% | |
| 4 | 12-Bhanu Pratap | IND | 10 | 2.87% | |
| 5 | 3-Priyanka | INC | 8 | 2.30% | |
| 6 | 7-Durvijay Pal | VPI | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | 10-Suresh Kumar | MAP | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | 11-Brijesh Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | 9-Mool Chand Jaiswal | AAP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | 6-Jitendra Kumar | BMP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | 8-Manoj Kumar | RJSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | 5-Chandresh | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 348 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 151 | 42.78% | 1 | 219 | Strong |
| BSP | 108 | 30.59% | 2 | 216 | Average |
| SP | 64 | 18.13% | 3 | 370 | Weak |
| IND | 11 | 3.12% | 4 | 12 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 2.27% | 5 | 104 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.57% | 6 | 176 | Poor |
| VPI | 2 | 0.57% | 7 | 52 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.28% | 8 | 149 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.28% | 9 | 200 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 342 | Poor |
| RJSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 263 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 281, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.