PS TAHSEENPUR ROOM NO.-1 PS 82
Amit Singh Chauhan
BJPBharatiya Janata Party502 votes at this polling station
over Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 502 | 69.92% | |
| 2 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 166 | 23.12% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 16 | 2.23% | |
| 4 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 11 | 1.53% | |
| 5 | NOTA | - | 7 | 0.97% | |
| 6 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 6 | 0.84% | |
| 7 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 718 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 502 | 69.92% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| SP | 166 | 23.12% | 2 | 309 | Weak |
| BSP | 16 | 2.23% | 3 | 337 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 1.53% | 4 | 129 | Poor |
| - | 7 | 0.97% | 5 | 33 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 0.84% | 6 | 60 | Poor |
| RBP | 4 | 0.56% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 39 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 99 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 185 | Poor |
| ADBP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 139 | Poor |
| MAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 338 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.