PS TANDWA PS 42
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party327 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 327 | 64.88% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 90 | 17.86% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 49 | 9.72% | |
| 4 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 27 | 5.36% | |
| 5 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 6 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 7 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 8 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | NOTA | - | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 504 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 327 | 64.88% | 1 | 81 | Strong |
| BJP | 90 | 17.86% | 2 | 404 | Weak |
| BSP | 49 | 9.72% | 3 | 185 | Poor |
| INC | 27 | 5.36% | 4 | 21 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.79% | 5 | 157 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.40% | 6 | 103 | Poor |
| RBP | 2 | 0.40% | 7 | 150 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 101 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 182 | Poor |
| - | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 326 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 291 | Poor |
| ADBP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 257 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.