PS SULHEPUR PS 394
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party269 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 269 | 41.84% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 200 | 31.10% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 123 | 19.13% | |
| 4 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 18 | 2.80% | |
| 5 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 11 | 1.71% | |
| 6 | NOTA | - | 9 | 1.40% | |
| 7 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 8 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 643 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 269 | 41.84% | 1 | 141 | Strong |
| BJP | 200 | 31.10% | 2 | 289 | Average |
| BSP | 123 | 19.13% | 3 | 26 | Weak |
| INC | 18 | 2.80% | 4 | 58 | Poor |
| ADBP | 11 | 1.71% | 5 | 13 | Poor |
| - | 9 | 1.40% | 6 | 17 | Poor |
| MAP | 6 | 0.93% | 7 | 10 | Poor |
| RBP | 3 | 0.47% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.31% | 9 | 330 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 290 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 218 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 417 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.