GLOBLE INTER COLLEGE SONKHARI ROOM NO. 1 PS 392
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party355 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 355 | 74.89% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 65 | 13.71% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 31 | 6.54% | |
| 4 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 8 | 1.69% | |
| 5 | NOTA | - | 7 | 1.48% | |
| 6 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 3 | 0.63% | |
| 7 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 474 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 355 | 74.89% | 1 | 57 | Strong |
| BJP | 65 | 13.71% | 2 | 413 | Weak |
| BSP | 31 | 6.54% | 3 | 258 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.69% | 4 | 207 | Poor |
| - | 7 | 1.48% | 5 | 43 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.63% | 6 | 69 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.42% | 7 | 163 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 392 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 308 | Poor |
| RBP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 323 | Poor |
| ADBP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 415 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 417 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.