PS VASUDEVPUR PS 391
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party420 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 420 | 54.05% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 162 | 20.85% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 116 | 14.93% | |
| 4 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 31 | 3.99% | |
| 5 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 17 | 2.19% | |
| 6 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 11 | 1.42% | |
| 7 | NOTA | - | 6 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 5 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 10 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.13% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 777 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 420 | 54.05% | 1 | 33 | Strong |
| BJP | 162 | 20.85% | 2 | 339 | Weak |
| BSP | 116 | 14.93% | 3 | 30 | Weak |
| ADBP | 31 | 3.99% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 2.19% | 5 | 65 | Poor |
| AAP | 11 | 1.42% | 6 | 4 | Poor |
| - | 6 | 0.77% | 7 | 66 | Poor |
| RBP | 5 | 0.64% | 8 | 54 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.39% | 9 | 28 | Poor |
| MAP | 3 | 0.39% | 10 | 86 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.26% | 11 | 329 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.13% | 12 | 289 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.