GGIC TOROMAFI ROOM NO. 3 PS 388
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party332 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 332 | 48.54% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 201 | 29.39% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 115 | 16.81% | |
| 4 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 10 | 1.46% | |
| 5 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 9 | 1.32% | |
| 6 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 6 | 0.88% | |
| 7 | NOTA | - | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 684 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 332 | 48.54% | 1 | 78 | Strong |
| BJP | 201 | 29.39% | 2 | 288 | Average |
| BSP | 115 | 16.81% | 3 | 34 | Weak |
| ADBP | 10 | 1.46% | 4 | 16 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.32% | 5 | 183 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 0.88% | 6 | 86 | Poor |
| - | 4 | 0.58% | 7 | 157 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.29% | 8 | 146 | Poor |
| RBP | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 223 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 288 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 215 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.15% | 12 | 306 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.