PS DHARMDASPUR PS 279
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party323 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 323 | 59.27% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 117 | 21.47% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 79 | 14.50% | |
| 4 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 14 | 2.57% | |
| 5 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 6 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 8 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NOTA | - | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 545 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 323 | 59.27% | 1 | 86 | Strong |
| BJP | 117 | 21.47% | 2 | 387 | Weak |
| BSP | 79 | 14.50% | 3 | 84 | Weak |
| INC | 14 | 2.57% | 4 | 92 | Poor |
| MAP | 5 | 0.92% | 5 | 16 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.55% | 6 | 57 | Poor |
| ADBP | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 97 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 183 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 373 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 375 | Poor |
| - | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 414 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 390 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.