PS KAIL KESHAVPUR ROOM NO. 1 PS 256
Amit Singh Chauhan
BJPBharatiya Janata Party456 votes at this polling station
over Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 456 | 71.14% | |
| 2 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 122 | 19.03% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 27 | 4.21% | |
| 4 | NOTA | - | 9 | 1.40% | |
| 5 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 7 | 1.09% | |
| 6 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 7 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 8 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 641 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 456 | 71.14% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| SP | 122 | 19.03% | 2 | 363 | Weak |
| BSP | 27 | 4.21% | 3 | 291 | Poor |
| - | 9 | 1.40% | 4 | 14 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.09% | 5 | 239 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.78% | 6 | 20 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.78% | 7 | 129 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.47% | 8 | 25 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.31% | 10 | 146 | Poor |
| RBP | 2 | 0.31% | 11 | 198 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.31% | 9 | 138 | Poor |
| ADBP | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 193 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.