PS ANTPUR PS 248
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party362 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 362 | 41.32% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 304 | 34.70% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 128 | 14.61% | |
| 4 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 24 | 2.74% | |
| 5 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 20 | 2.28% | |
| 6 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 14 | 1.60% | |
| 7 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 8 | 0.91% | |
| 8 | NOTA | - | 6 | 0.68% | |
| 9 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 5 | 0.57% | |
| 10 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 2 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 2 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 1 | 0.11% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 876 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 362 | 41.32% | 1 | 50 | Strong |
| BJP | 304 | 34.70% | 2 | 127 | Average |
| BSP | 128 | 14.61% | 3 | 21 | Weak |
| ADBP | 24 | 2.74% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| INC | 20 | 2.28% | 5 | 45 | Poor |
| RBP | 14 | 1.60% | 6 | 11 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 0.91% | 7 | 1 | Poor |
| - | 6 | 0.68% | 8 | 57 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.57% | 9 | 127 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.23% | 10 | 66 | Poor |
| MAP | 2 | 0.23% | 11 | 145 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.11% | 12 | 231 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.