PS SARIYAWAN ROOM NO. 5 PS 234
Amit Singh Chauhan
BJPBharatiya Janata Party268 votes at this polling station
over Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 268 | 37.59% | |
| 2 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 212 | 29.73% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 196 | 27.49% | |
| 4 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 10 | 1.40% | |
| 5 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 7 | 0.98% | |
| 6 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 7 | NOTA | - | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 1 | 0.14% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 713 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 268 | 37.59% | 1 | 172 | Average |
| SP | 212 | 29.73% | 2 | 231 | Average |
| BSP | 196 | 27.49% | 3 | 4 | Average |
| CPI | 10 | 1.40% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 0.98% | 5 | 236 | Poor |
| MAP | 5 | 0.70% | 6 | 13 | Poor |
| - | 4 | 0.56% | 7 | 139 | Poor |
| ADBP | 3 | 0.42% | 8 | 50 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.42% | 9 | 66 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 116 | Poor |
| RBP | 2 | 0.28% | 11 | 194 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.14% | 12 | 166 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.