PS BHAIPUR PS 213
Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar
SPSamajwadi Party414 votes at this polling station
over Amit Singh Chauhan (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 414 | 48.03% | |
| 2 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 303 | 35.15% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 73 | 8.47% | |
| 4 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 40 | 4.64% | |
| 5 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 8 | 0.93% | |
| 6 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 7 | 0.81% | |
| 7 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 6 | 0.70% | |
| 8 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 6 | 0.70% | |
| 9 | NOTA | - | 2 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 11 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 12 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 1 | 0.12% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 862 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 414 | 48.03% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| BJP | 303 | 35.15% | 2 | 129 | Average |
| BSP | 73 | 8.47% | 3 | 95 | Poor |
| INC | 40 | 4.64% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| ADBP | 8 | 0.93% | 5 | 20 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 0.81% | 6 | 41 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 0.70% | 7 | 10 | Poor |
| RBP | 6 | 0.70% | 8 | 39 | Poor |
| - | 2 | 0.23% | 9 | 276 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.12% | 10 | 232 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.12% | 11 | 162 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.12% | 12 | 256 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.