JHS MOHAMMADPUR ROOM NO. 2 PS 11
Amit Singh Chauhan
BJPBharatiya Janata Party379 votes at this polling station
over Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Singh Chauhan | BJP | 379 | 60.16% | |
| 2 | Firoz Khan Urf Gabbar | SP | 203 | 32.22% | |
| 3 | Sunil Kumar Pathak | BSP | 23 | 3.65% | |
| 4 | NOTA | - | 7 | 1.11% | |
| 5 | Akhilesh Yadav | INC | 5 | 0.79% | |
| 6 | Bhupendra Pratap | IND | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 7 | Madhu Dwivedi | CPI | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | Hajari Lal | RBP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | Jang Bahadur Kori | MAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Disha Patel | ADBP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Raj Kumar | JAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Sunil Kumar Srivastava (Samaj Sevi) | AAP | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 630 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 379 | 60.16% | 1 | 45 | Strong |
| SP | 203 | 32.22% | 2 | 248 | Average |
| BSP | 23 | 3.65% | 3 | 303 | Poor |
| - | 7 | 1.11% | 4 | 29 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.79% | 5 | 287 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.63% | 6 | 21 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.48% | 7 | 216 | Poor |
| RBP | 2 | 0.32% | 8 | 142 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 160 | Poor |
| ADBP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 116 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 91 | Poor |
| MAP | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 187 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 274, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.