PRIMARY SCHOOL RANINAGAL ROOM-1 PS 96
MOHD NASIR
SPSP573 votes at this polling station
over K K MISRA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 573 | 90.95% | |
| 2 | K K MISRA | BJP | 8 | 1.27% | |
| 3 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 7 | 1.11% | |
| 4 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 6 | 0.95% | |
| 5 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 6 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 5 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | AKRAM | ASP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 8 | AYYOOB | PP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 9 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 10 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 11 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 12 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 13 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 630 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 573 | 90.66% | 1 | 67 | Strong |
| BJP | 8 | 1.27% | 2 | 372 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 7 | 1.11% | 3 | 92 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 0.95% | 4 | 158 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.95% | 5 | 135 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 0.95% | 6 | 30 | Poor |
| LJP | 4 | 0.63% | 9 | 2 | Poor |
| NEP | 4 | 0.63% | 10 | 10 | Poor |
| PP | 4 | 0.63% | 11 | 1 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.63% | 8 | 24 | Poor |
| SUCI | 4 | 0.63% | 12 | 1 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.63% | 7 | 7 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.