PRIMARY SCHOOL VILAKUDAN ROOM-1 PS 93
MOHD NASIR
SPSP488 votes at this polling station
over K K MISRA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 488 | 78.21% | |
| 2 | K K MISRA | BJP | 70 | 11.22% | |
| 3 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 52 | 8.33% | |
| 4 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 6 | 0.96% | |
| 5 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 6 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AKRAM | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AYYOOB | PP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 624 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 488 | 78.08% | 1 | 137 | Strong |
| BJP | 70 | 11.20% | 2 | 244 | Weak |
| BSP | 52 | 8.32% | 3 | 66 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.96% | 4 | 133 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 4 | 0.64% | 5 | 145 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.32% | 6 | 162 | Poor |
| SUCI | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 51 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 88 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 273 | Poor |
| LJP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 180 | Poor |
| NEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 246 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 152 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.