PRIMARY SCHOOL SAMDA CHATURBHUJ PS 80
K K MISRA
BJPBJP656 votes at this polling station
over MOHD NASIR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K K MISRA | BJP | 656 | 87.70% | |
| 2 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 37 | 4.95% | |
| 3 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 33 | 4.41% | |
| 4 | AKRAM | ASP | 9 | 1.20% | |
| 5 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 6 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 7 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | AYYOOB | PP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 748 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 656 | 86.66% | 1 | 13 | Strong |
| SP | 37 | 4.89% | 2 | 371 | Poor |
| BSP | 33 | 4.36% | 3 | 90 | Poor |
| ASP | 9 | 1.19% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.66% | 5 | 42 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.40% | 6 | 167 | Poor |
| NEP | 2 | 0.26% | 7 | 54 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 37 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 48 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 85 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 407 | Poor |
| SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 156 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.