PRIMARY SCHOOL DANDI DURJAN PS 76
K K MISRA
BJPBJP611 votes at this polling station
over AKEEL CHOUDHARY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K K MISRA | BJP | 611 | 86.06% | |
| 2 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 48 | 6.76% | |
| 3 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 33 | 4.65% | |
| 4 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 5 | AKRAM | ASP | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 6 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | AYYOOB | PP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 710 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 611 | 86.06% | 1 | 18 | Strong |
| BSP | 48 | 6.76% | 2 | 67 | Poor |
| SP | 33 | 4.65% | 3 | 380 | Poor |
| NEP | 5 | 0.70% | 4 | 6 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.56% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.42% | 6 | 116 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 298 | Poor |
| SUCI | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 12 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 83 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 35 | Poor |
| LJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 168 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 324 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.