PANCHAYAT GHAR SHAHPUR ROOM-3 PS 50
MOHD NASIR
SPSP393 votes at this polling station
over AKEEL CHOUDHARY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 393 | 64.53% | |
| 2 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 117 | 19.21% | |
| 3 | K K MISRA | BJP | 74 | 12.15% | |
| 4 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 11 | 1.81% | |
| 5 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 8 | 1.31% | |
| 6 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | AYYOOB | PP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AKRAM | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 609 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 393 | 64.11% | 1 | 191 | Strong |
| BSP | 117 | 19.09% | 2 | 39 | Weak |
| BJP | 74 | 12.07% | 3 | 237 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 11 | 1.79% | 4 | 57 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.31% | 5 | 75 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.65% | 6 | 64 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 40 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 28 | Poor |
| SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 137 | Poor |
| NEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 227 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 250 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 192 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.