MAHARAJA AGRASEN INTER COLLEGE ROOM-3 PS 220
MOHD NASIR
SPSP502 votes at this polling station
over K K MISRA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 502 | 60.41% | |
| 2 | K K MISRA | BJP | 281 | 33.81% | |
| 3 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 34 | 4.09% | |
| 4 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 5 | 0.60% | |
| 5 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 6 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 9 | AKRAM | ASP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 10 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 11 | AYYOOB | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 831 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 502 | 60.05% | 1 | 124 | Strong |
| BJP | 281 | 33.61% | 2 | 143 | Average |
| BSP | 34 | 4.07% | 3 | 88 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 0.84% | 4 | 22 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.24% | 6 | 319 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.24% | 5 | 226 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.12% | 7 | 170 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.12% | 8 | 75 | Poor |
| NEP | 1 | 0.12% | 9 | 148 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 241 | Poor |
| SUCI | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 252 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 298 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.