BLOCK OFFICE MORADABAD ROOM-10 PS 205
MOHD NASIR
SPSP598 votes at this polling station
over K K MISRA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 598 | 97.39% | |
| 2 | K K MISRA | BJP | 6 | 0.98% | |
| 3 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 4 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 5 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 6 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | AKRAM | ASP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | AYYOOB | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 614 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 598 | 96.92% | 1 | 56 | Strong |
| BJP | 6 | 0.97% | 2 | 383 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.32% | 3 | 223 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.32% | 4 | 318 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.32% | 5 | 184 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 168 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 293 | Poor |
| SUCI | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 80 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 6 | 110 | Poor |
| LJP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 258 | Poor |
| NEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 294 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 231 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.