BLOCK OFFICE MORADABAD ROOM-1 PS 204
MOHD NASIR
SPSP445 votes at this polling station
over K K MISRA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 445 | 93.29% | |
| 2 | K K MISRA | BJP | 15 | 3.14% | |
| 3 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 4 | 0.84% | |
| 4 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 3 | 0.63% | |
| 5 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 6 | AKRAM | ASP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 7 | AYYOOB | PP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 477 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 445 | 92.52% | 1 | 157 | Strong |
| BJP | 15 | 3.12% | 2 | 343 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.83% | 3 | 205 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.83% | 4 | 80 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.42% | 5 | 46 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.42% | 6 | 95 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 64 | Poor |
| SUCI | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 79 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.21% | 7 | 284 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 292 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 71 | Poor |
| NEP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 293 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.