PRIMARY SCHOOL RAMNAGAR MAJHRA PS 164
K K MISRA
BJPBJP582 votes at this polling station
over MOHD NASIR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K K MISRA | BJP | 582 | 86.09% | |
| 2 | MOHD NASIR | SP | 72 | 10.65% | |
| 3 | SHEESHPAL | NEP | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 4 | AKRAM | ASP | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 5 | AKEEL CHOUDHARY | BSP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 6 | ISHRAT ALI | AAP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 7 | MOHID FARGANI | AIMIM | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | KAMAL KAPOOR | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | LUBNA SUHEL | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | VIVEK KUMAR BHATNAGAR | LJP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | SHISHUPAL SINGH | SUCI | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | HAJI IKRAM QURESHI | INC | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | AYYOOB | PP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 676 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 582 | 85.84% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| SP | 72 | 10.62% | 2 | 335 | Weak |
| ASP | 4 | 0.59% | 3 | 30 | Poor |
| NEP | 4 | 0.59% | 4 | 14 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.44% | 6 | 130 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.44% | 5 | 201 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 36 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.29% | 8 | 217 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 373 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 61 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 58 | Poor |
| SUCI | 1 | 0.15% | 12 | 67 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 27, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.