CHANDRASEKHAR AJAD JU.HA.SCHOOL SINGPUR KHURD P.BHAG-1 PS 76
RAMDEV NIDAR
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY210 votes at this polling station
over RAJBALI JAISAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 210 | 51.72% | |
| 2 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 99 | 24.38% | |
| 3 | RAJMANI | BJP | 59 | 14.53% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 20 | 4.93% | |
| 5 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 7 | 1.72% | |
| 6 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 4 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | SIYARAM | SP | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 10 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 406 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 210 | 51.60% | 1 | 94 | Strong |
| BSP | 99 | 24.32% | 2 | 96 | Weak |
| BJP | 59 | 14.50% | 3 | 391 | Weak |
| INC | 20 | 4.91% | 4 | 275 | Poor |
| CPIM | 7 | 1.72% | 5 | 48 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.98% | 6 | 56 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.49% | 9 | 277 | Poor |
| SP | 2 | 0.49% | 8 | 202 | Poor |
| RSDR | 2 | 0.49% | 7 | 148 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 301 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 368 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 329 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.