PRA.VI.SILAUDHIKALA U.M..BHAG-2 PS 65
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY279 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 279 | 58.61% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 139 | 29.20% | |
| 3 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 20 | 4.20% | |
| 4 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 18 | 3.78% | |
| 5 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 7 | 1.47% | |
| 6 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 5 | 1.05% | |
| 7 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | SIYARAM | SP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 476 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 279 | 57.88% | 1 | 83 | Strong |
| SP | 139 | 28.84% | 2 | 192 | Average |
| INC | 20 | 4.15% | 3 | 274 | Poor |
| BSP | 18 | 3.73% | 4 | 329 | Poor |
| SS | 7 | 1.45% | 5 | 119 | Poor |
| RSDR | 5 | 1.04% | 6 | 28 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.41% | 9 | 154 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.41% | 7 | 238 | Poor |
| CPIM | 2 | 0.41% | 8 | 273 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 225 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 292 | Poor |
| SP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 357 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.