PRA.VI.HARDIHA PU.BHAG PS 59
RAMDEV NIDAR
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY203 votes at this polling station
over RAJBALI JAISAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 203 | 33.50% | |
| 2 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 182 | 30.03% | |
| 3 | RAJMANI | BJP | 166 | 27.39% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 32 | 5.28% | |
| 5 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 7 | SIYARAM | SP | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 8 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 9 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 606 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 203 | 33.17% | 1 | 104 | Average |
| BSP | 182 | 29.74% | 2 | 18 | Average |
| BJP | 166 | 27.12% | 3 | 266 | Average |
| INC | 32 | 5.23% | 4 | 215 | Poor |
| CPIM | 5 | 0.82% | 5 | 111 | Poor |
| SS | 5 | 0.82% | 6 | 163 | Poor |
| SP | 4 | 0.65% | 8 | 86 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.65% | 7 | 126 | Poor |
| SSRD | 3 | 0.49% | 9 | 157 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 223 | Poor |
| RSDR | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 241 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 338 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.