PRA. VIDYALAY BADIDHA K.S.-2 PS 5
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY153 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 153 | 42.50% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 132 | 36.67% | |
| 3 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 43 | 11.94% | |
| 4 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 25 | 6.94% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 3 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | SIYARAM | SP | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 7 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 360 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 153 | 40.69% | 1 | 283 | Strong |
| SP | 132 | 35.11% | 2 | 200 | Average |
| INC | 43 | 11.44% | 3 | 175 | Weak |
| BSP | 25 | 6.65% | 4 | 297 | Poor |
| SSRD | 3 | 0.80% | 5 | 150 | Poor |
| RSDR | 2 | 0.53% | 6 | 130 | Poor |
| SP | 2 | 0.53% | 7 | 194 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 310 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 352 | Poor |
| CPIM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 366 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 370 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 331 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.