PRA.VI.BASAHARA D BHAG-1 PS 48
RAMKRIPAL
INCINDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS128 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 128 | 35.07% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 109 | 29.86% | |
| 3 | RAJMANI | BJP | 85 | 23.29% | |
| 4 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 27 | 7.40% | |
| 5 | SIYARAM | SP | 7 | 1.92% | |
| 6 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 7 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 365 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INC | 128 | 34.22% | 1 | 34 | Average |
| SP | 109 | 29.14% | 2 | 251 | Average |
| BJP | 85 | 22.73% | 3 | 367 | Weak |
| BSP | 27 | 7.22% | 4 | 282 | Poor |
| SP | 7 | 1.87% | 5 | 17 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.80% | 6 | 92 | Poor |
| RSDR | 2 | 0.53% | 8 | 139 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.53% | 7 | 235 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.27% | 9 | 287 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.27% | 10 | 336 | Poor |
| CPIM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 372 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 322 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.