PRA.VI.SHIVPUR CHHADHGDHA K.S.-2 PS 379
RAJBALI JAISAL
BSPBAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY142 votes at this polling station
over RAJMANI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 142 | 34.38% | |
| 2 | RAJMANI | BJP | 114 | 27.60% | |
| 3 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 91 | 22.03% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 15 | 3.63% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 8 | 1.94% | |
| 6 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 8 | 1.94% | |
| 7 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 7 | 1.69% | |
| 8 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 7 | 1.69% | |
| 9 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 6 | 1.45% | |
| 10 | SIYARAM | SP | 6 | 1.45% | |
| 11 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 5 | 1.21% | |
| 12 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 4 | 0.97% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 413 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 142 | 33.81% | 1 | 43 | Average |
| BJP | 114 | 27.14% | 2 | 334 | Average |
| SP | 91 | 21.67% | 3 | 280 | Weak |
| INC | 15 | 3.57% | 4 | 308 | Poor |
| CPIM | 8 | 1.90% | 5 | 40 | Poor |
| SSRD | 8 | 1.90% | 6 | 22 | Poor |
| SS | 7 | 1.67% | 8 | 136 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 1.67% | 7 | 64 | Poor |
| SP | 6 | 1.43% | 9 | 45 | Poor |
| VIP | 6 | 1.43% | 10 | 34 | Poor |
| RSDR | 5 | 1.19% | 11 | 47 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.95% | 12 | 94 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.