PRA.VI.SANSARPUR K.S.-2 PS 360
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY156 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 156 | 35.86% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 130 | 29.89% | |
| 3 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 62 | 14.25% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 58 | 13.33% | |
| 5 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 9 | 2.07% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 7 | 1.61% | |
| 7 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 4 | 0.92% | |
| 8 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 9 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 10 | SIYARAM | SP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 11 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 1 | 0.23% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 435 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 156 | 35.29% | 1 | 279 | Average |
| SP | 130 | 29.41% | 2 | 205 | Average |
| BSP | 62 | 14.03% | 3 | 167 | Weak |
| INC | 58 | 13.12% | 4 | 139 | Weak |
| SS | 9 | 2.04% | 5 | 100 | Poor |
| SSRD | 7 | 1.58% | 6 | 32 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.90% | 7 | 157 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.68% | 8 | 132 | Poor |
| CPIM | 2 | 0.45% | 9 | 322 | Poor |
| SP | 2 | 0.45% | 10 | 262 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 296 | Poor |
| RSDR | 1 | 0.23% | 12 | 332 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.