PRA.PA.BALAPUR PS 354

AC 265 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

RAMDEV NIDAR

SPSAMAJWADI PARTY

156 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

32 8.7 pp

votes

over RAJMANI (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors570

Total turnout371votes cast at this station

Turnout %65.1% of this booth's roll

Male electors189

Female electors182

Vote share in this booth

of 370 votes counted

SP 42.2% BJP 33.5% BSP 17.8% INC 3.2% CPIM 0.8% AAP 0.8% SP 0.5% JAP 0.3% SS 0.3% VIP 0.3% SSRD 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	RAMDEV NIDAR	SP	156	42.16%
2	RAJMANI	BJP	124	33.51%
3	RAJBALI JAISAL	BSP	66	17.84%
4	RAMKRIPAL	INC	12	3.24%
5	CHIRAUNJI LAL	CPIM	3	0.81%
6	HARISH CHANDRA	AAP	3	0.81%
7	SIYARAM	SP	2	0.54%
8	ASHOK DHURIYA	JAP	1	0.27%
9	ARATI DEVI	SS	1	0.27%
10	DHARMADAS	VIP	1	0.27%
11	SANTOSH KUMAR	SSRD	1	0.27%
12	AKABAL BAHADUR	RSDR	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 370 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 265

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	156	42.05%	1	163	Strong
BJP	124	33.42%	2	321	Average
BSP	66	17.79%	3	156	Weak
INC	12	3.23%	4	324	Poor
AAP	3	0.81%	5	222	Poor
CPIM	3	0.81%	6	252	Poor
SP	2	0.54%	7	261	Poor
SSRD	1	0.27%	9	354	Poor
SS	1	0.27%	10	366	Poor
VIP	1	0.27%	11	322	Poor
JAP	1	0.27%	8	292	Poor
RSDR	0	0.00%	12	396	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.