PRA.VI.LAKHAPUR (PAITIHA)K.S.-2 PS 351
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY206 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 206 | 54.64% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 130 | 34.48% | |
| 3 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 17 | 4.51% | |
| 4 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 6 | 1.59% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 5 | 1.33% | |
| 6 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 3 | 0.80% | |
| 7 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 3 | 0.80% | |
| 8 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 10 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | SIYARAM | SP | 1 | 0.27% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 377 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 206 | 54.07% | 1 | 202 | Strong |
| SP | 130 | 34.12% | 2 | 204 | Average |
| INC | 17 | 4.46% | 3 | 294 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 1.57% | 4 | 386 | Poor |
| SSRD | 5 | 1.31% | 5 | 95 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.79% | 6 | 221 | Poor |
| CPIM | 3 | 0.79% | 7 | 251 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.52% | 9 | 315 | Poor |
| RSDR | 2 | 0.52% | 8 | 213 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.26% | 12 | 321 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.26% | 10 | 291 | Poor |
| SP | 1 | 0.26% | 11 | 333 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.