PRA.VI.PTHARTAL PU.BHAG PS 288
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY303 votes at this polling station
over RAJBALI JAISAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 303 | 41.51% | |
| 2 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 187 | 25.62% | |
| 3 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 120 | 16.44% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 71 | 9.73% | |
| 5 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 29 | 3.97% | |
| 6 | SIYARAM | SP | 6 | 0.82% | |
| 7 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 6 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 730 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 303 | 40.89% | 1 | 64 | Strong |
| BSP | 187 | 25.24% | 2 | 16 | Average |
| SP | 120 | 16.19% | 3 | 228 | Weak |
| INC | 71 | 9.58% | 4 | 114 | Poor |
| AAP | 29 | 3.91% | 5 | 6 | Poor |
| SP | 6 | 0.81% | 6 | 37 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 0.81% | 7 | 154 | Poor |
| CPIM | 4 | 0.54% | 8 | 177 | Poor |
| RSDR | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 196 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.13% | 11 | 304 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 344 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 382 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.