PRA.VI.MEJAM KHASH PU.BHAG PS 28
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY225 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 225 | 40.91% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 170 | 30.91% | |
| 3 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 124 | 22.55% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 22 | 4.00% | |
| 5 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 6 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 7 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | SIYARAM | SP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 550 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 225 | 40.76% | 1 | 167 | Strong |
| SP | 170 | 30.80% | 2 | 149 | Average |
| BSP | 124 | 22.46% | 3 | 60 | Weak |
| INC | 22 | 3.99% | 4 | 266 | Poor |
| RSDR | 4 | 0.72% | 5 | 50 | Poor |
| CPIM | 2 | 0.36% | 6 | 265 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 295 | Poor |
| SP | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 271 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 281 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 373 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 333 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 315 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.