SIVJIYAWAN I.C.LEDIYARI D.M. BHAG PS 259
RAJBALI JAISAL
BSPBAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY209 votes at this polling station
over RAJMANI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 209 | 42.14% | |
| 2 | RAJMANI | BJP | 136 | 27.42% | |
| 3 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 113 | 22.78% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 15 | 3.02% | |
| 5 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 6 | 1.21% | |
| 6 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 4 | 0.81% | |
| 7 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 10 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | SIYARAM | SP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 496 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 209 | 41.63% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| BJP | 136 | 27.09% | 2 | 308 | Average |
| SP | 113 | 22.51% | 3 | 247 | Weak |
| INC | 15 | 2.99% | 4 | 307 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 1.20% | 5 | 150 | Poor |
| RSDR | 4 | 0.80% | 6 | 61 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.60% | 7 | 204 | Poor |
| CPIM | 3 | 0.60% | 8 | 237 | Poor |
| SSRD | 3 | 0.60% | 9 | 178 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.40% | 10 | 184 | Poor |
| SP | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 313 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.20% | 12 | 298 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.