GOPAL VI.I.C.KORAON PU. BHAG PS 225
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY260 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 260 | 49.24% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 195 | 36.93% | |
| 3 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 36 | 6.82% | |
| 4 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 15 | 2.84% | |
| 5 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 5 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 7 | SIYARAM | SP | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 8 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 9 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 11 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 528 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 260 | 48.42% | 1 | 108 | Strong |
| SP | 195 | 36.31% | 2 | 117 | Average |
| INC | 36 | 6.70% | 3 | 198 | Poor |
| BSP | 15 | 2.79% | 4 | 345 | Poor |
| SS | 5 | 0.93% | 5 | 173 | Poor |
| SP | 4 | 0.74% | 6 | 107 | Poor |
| SSRD | 4 | 0.74% | 7 | 118 | Poor |
| RSDR | 3 | 0.56% | 8 | 110 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.37% | 10 | 177 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.37% | 9 | 264 | Poor |
| CPIM | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 353 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.19% | 12 | 292 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.