PRA.VI. KORAON PRATHAM P.BHAG PS 221
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY302 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 302 | 57.74% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 169 | 32.31% | |
| 3 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 14 | 2.68% | |
| 4 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 11 | 2.10% | |
| 5 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 11 | 2.10% | |
| 6 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 7 | 1.34% | |
| 7 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 8 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | SIYARAM | SP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 523 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 302 | 57.20% | 1 | 65 | Strong |
| SP | 169 | 32.01% | 2 | 151 | Average |
| BSP | 14 | 2.65% | 3 | 350 | Poor |
| SS | 11 | 2.08% | 4 | 72 | Poor |
| VIP | 11 | 2.08% | 5 | 13 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.33% | 6 | 372 | Poor |
| RSDR | 4 | 0.76% | 7 | 59 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.38% | 8 | 263 | Poor |
| CPIM | 2 | 0.38% | 9 | 295 | Poor |
| SP | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 305 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 386 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 363 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.