PRA.VI.KORAON PRATHAM U BHAG PS 219
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY352 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 352 | 54.32% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 197 | 30.40% | |
| 3 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 45 | 6.94% | |
| 4 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 22 | 3.40% | |
| 5 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 16 | 2.47% | |
| 6 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 7 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | SIYARAM | SP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 648 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 352 | 53.33% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| SP | 197 | 29.85% | 2 | 114 | Average |
| INC | 45 | 6.82% | 3 | 169 | Poor |
| SS | 22 | 3.33% | 4 | 26 | Poor |
| BSP | 16 | 2.42% | 5 | 339 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.76% | 6 | 105 | Poor |
| CPIM | 5 | 0.76% | 7 | 132 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 176 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 184 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 326 | Poor |
| RSDR | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 286 | Poor |
| SP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 377 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.