PRA.VI.PURALAKSHAN PS 200
RAMKRIPAL
INCINDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS180 votes at this polling station
over RAJBALI JAISAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 180 | 30.25% | |
| 2 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 117 | 19.66% | |
| 3 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 99 | 16.64% | |
| 4 | RAJMANI | BJP | 93 | 15.63% | |
| 5 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 71 | 11.93% | |
| 6 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 19 | 3.19% | |
| 7 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 8 | 1.34% | |
| 8 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 11 | SIYARAM | SP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 595 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INC | 180 | 30.05% | 1 | 15 | Average |
| BSP | 117 | 19.53% | 2 | 70 | Weak |
| SP | 99 | 16.53% | 3 | 267 | Weak |
| BJP | 93 | 15.53% | 4 | 364 | Weak |
| CPIM | 71 | 11.85% | 5 | 1 | Weak |
| SS | 19 | 3.17% | 6 | 32 | Poor |
| AAP | 8 | 1.34% | 7 | 42 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.50% | 8 | 113 | Poor |
| RSDR | 2 | 0.33% | 9 | 175 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.33% | 10 | 179 | Poor |
| SP | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 303 | Poor |
| SSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 383 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.