PRA.VI.HATA K.S.-1 PS 179

AC 265 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

RAMDEV NIDAR

SPSAMAJWADI PARTY

283 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

141 24.4 pp

votes

over RAJMANI (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors842

Total turnout583votes cast at this station

Turnout %69.2% of this booth's roll

Male electors303

Female electors280

Vote share in this booth

of 577 votes counted

SP 49.0% BJP 24.6% BSP 24.4% RSDR 0.5% INC 0.3% SS 0.3% VIP 0.2% SSRD 0.2% SP 0.2% AAP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	RAMDEV NIDAR	SP	283	49.05%
2	RAJMANI	BJP	142	24.61%
3	RAJBALI JAISAL	BSP	141	24.44%
4	AKABAL BAHADUR	RSDR	3	0.52%
5	RAMKRIPAL	INC	2	0.35%
6	ARATI DEVI	SS	2	0.35%
7	DHARMADAS	VIP	1	0.17%
8	SANTOSH KUMAR	SSRD	1	0.17%
9	SIYARAM	SP	1	0.17%
10	HARISH CHANDRA	AAP	1	0.17%
11	CHIRAUNJI LAL	CPIM	0	0.00%
12	ASHOK DHURIYA	JAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 577 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 265

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	283	48.54%	1	33	Strong
BJP	142	24.36%	2	299	Weak
BSP	141	24.19%	3	44	Weak
RSDR	3	0.51%	4	105	Poor
SS	2	0.34%	6	294	Poor
INC	2	0.34%	5	399	Poor
SP	1	0.17%	8	300	Poor
SSRD	1	0.17%	9	314	Poor
AAP	1	0.17%	7	319	Poor
VIP	1	0.17%	10	279	Poor
CPIM	0	0.00%	11	383	Poor
JAP	0	0.00%	12	353	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.