PRA.VI.MEHAJAGEER K.S.-2 PS 176
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY159 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 159 | 37.06% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 155 | 36.13% | |
| 3 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 89 | 20.75% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 16 | 3.73% | |
| 5 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 6 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | SIYARAM | SP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 429 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 159 | 36.81% | 1 | 275 | Average |
| SP | 155 | 35.88% | 2 | 166 | Average |
| BSP | 89 | 20.60% | 3 | 109 | Weak |
| INC | 16 | 3.70% | 4 | 299 | Poor |
| CPIM | 3 | 0.69% | 5 | 226 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 170 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.46% | 7 | 175 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 313 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 354 | Poor |
| RSDR | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 271 | Poor |
| SP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 370 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 375 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.