PRA.VI..SHAHPUR KALA ROOM NO.-1 PS 12
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY314 votes at this polling station
over RAJBALI JAISAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 314 | 61.21% | |
| 2 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 134 | 26.12% | |
| 3 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 31 | 6.04% | |
| 4 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 8 | 1.56% | |
| 5 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 6 | 1.17% | |
| 6 | SIYARAM | SP | 5 | 0.97% | |
| 7 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 8 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 513 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 314 | 60.50% | 1 | 53 | Strong |
| BSP | 134 | 25.82% | 2 | 50 | Average |
| SP | 31 | 5.97% | 3 | 380 | Poor |
| SS | 8 | 1.54% | 4 | 103 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.16% | 5 | 376 | Poor |
| SP | 5 | 0.96% | 6 | 47 | Poor |
| SSRD | 4 | 0.77% | 7 | 101 | Poor |
| CPIM | 3 | 0.58% | 8 | 200 | Poor |
| RSDR | 3 | 0.58% | 9 | 76 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.39% | 10 | 230 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.39% | 11 | 136 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.19% | 12 | 229 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.