PURVA MADHYAMIK VIDHYALAY KHARAKA KHAS K.S.-1 PS 112
RAJMANI
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY320 votes at this polling station
over RAMDEV NIDAR (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJMANI | BJP | 320 | 72.56% | |
| 2 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 56 | 12.70% | |
| 3 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 32 | 7.26% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 7 | 1.59% | |
| 5 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 7 | 1.59% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 7 | SIYARAM | SP | 4 | 0.91% | |
| 8 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 9 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 10 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 11 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 1 | 0.23% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 441 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 320 | 71.91% | 1 | 46 | Strong |
| SP | 56 | 12.58% | 2 | 339 | Weak |
| BSP | 32 | 7.19% | 3 | 263 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.57% | 4 | 367 | Poor |
| SS | 7 | 1.57% | 5 | 125 | Poor |
| SSRD | 5 | 1.12% | 6 | 66 | Poor |
| SP | 4 | 0.90% | 7 | 94 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.67% | 8 | 180 | Poor |
| RSDR | 3 | 0.67% | 9 | 95 | Poor |
| CPIM | 2 | 0.45% | 10 | 278 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 235 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.22% | 12 | 262 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.