PRA.VI.TAUNGA KALA D.BHG PS 111
RAMDEV NIDAR
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY176 votes at this polling station
over RAJBALI JAISAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMDEV NIDAR | SP | 176 | 37.53% | |
| 2 | RAJBALI JAISAL | BSP | 152 | 32.41% | |
| 3 | RAJMANI | BJP | 109 | 23.24% | |
| 4 | RAMKRIPAL | INC | 20 | 4.26% | |
| 5 | CHIRAUNJI LAL | CPIM | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 6 | ARATI DEVI | SS | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 7 | AKABAL BAHADUR | RSDR | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | ASHOK DHURIYA | JAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | DHARMADAS | VIP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR | SSRD | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | SIYARAM | SP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | HARISH CHANDRA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 469 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 176 | 37.37% | 1 | 141 | Average |
| BSP | 152 | 32.27% | 2 | 31 | Average |
| BJP | 109 | 23.14% | 3 | 347 | Weak |
| INC | 20 | 4.25% | 4 | 277 | Poor |
| CPIM | 4 | 0.85% | 5 | 159 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.64% | 6 | 236 | Poor |
| RSDR | 2 | 0.42% | 7 | 154 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 234 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 261 | Poor |
| SSRD | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 300 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 364 | Poor |
| SP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 365 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 265, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.